Difference between revisions of "Plant Ontology Webinar- May 2011 release"
Line 29: | Line 29: | ||
==1. Philosophy behind the organization of the ontology== | ==1. Philosophy behind the organization of the ontology== | ||
− | How terms are | + | ===Ontology structure=== |
+ | |||
+ | Two domains: PGDSO and PAO (focus on PAO) | ||
+ | |||
+ | Top level of PAO: Plant structure, plant anatomical space, portion of plant substance | ||
+ | |||
+ | How terms are organized within the PAO: | ||
+ | |||
+ | (1)by structure, (2) with homology, if it is known | ||
+ | |||
+ | Aim for single inheritance, use multiple if necessary for users | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | ===Definitions=== | ||
+ | |||
+ | Genus-differentia form | ||
+ | |||
+ | Need to read the definition of the ancestor term to understand definition of child term | ||
+ | |||
+ | Relations are a part of the definition | ||
==2. What are the most important changes that had to be made to accommodate mosses and other non-angiosperm plants?== | ==2. What are the most important changes that had to be made to accommodate mosses and other non-angiosperm plants?== |
Revision as of 11:57, 13 May 2011
This page is under construction....
Goals:
To demonstrate the new plant anatomy terms that have been added to accommodate mosses and give reviewers a brief tutorial on how to use PO.
People to invite- potential Reviewers:
Stefan Rensing and Daniel Lang of the Physcomitrella group, University of Freiburg, Germany;
Brent Mishler, UC Berkeley, USA, (bmishler@berkeley.edu) Brent Mishler
Bill Buck (NYBG) William Buck (bbuck@nybg.org)
Michael L. Christianson- now at Department of Plant and Microbial Biology, University of California, Berkeley, California (mxianson@pacbell.net)
B. Crandall-Stotler (Southern Illinois University)
B. Goffinet (University of Connecticut)
Scott Schuette (Southern Illinois University) link
(will present talk on Physco bioinformatics at our symposium at the IBC)
Topics
1. Philosophy behind the organization of the ontology
Ontology structure
Two domains: PGDSO and PAO (focus on PAO)
Top level of PAO: Plant structure, plant anatomical space, portion of plant substance
How terms are organized within the PAO:
(1)by structure, (2) with homology, if it is known
Aim for single inheritance, use multiple if necessary for users
Definitions
Genus-differentia form
Need to read the definition of the ancestor term to understand definition of child term
Relations are a part of the definition
2. What are the most important changes that had to be made to accommodate mosses and other non-angiosperm plants?
Top level reorganization
Adding new categories to encompass all structures:
- collective plant structure
- cardinal organ part
- collective organ part structure
- embryonic plant structure
- rhizoid
- trichome
- plant anatomical space
Theses changes were important for all plants
New whole plant growth stages for plant life cycle phases
gametophytic phase and sporophytic phase
Use of participates_in relation allows us to specify structures that only occur in one generation
Redefining upper-level terms of the plant structure branch:
New definitions of plant cell, plant organ, portion of plant tissue, plus the new terms listed above, make these definitions appropriate for all plants
Mid-level and lower-level terms
Added important structures that were missing: sporangium, gametangium, protonema, gametophore, thallus
Redefined mid-level terms to fit broader range of taxa (often had to obsolete and replace, if definition was very different). Example: megagametophyte, microgametophyte, microsporangium,
Created general mid-level categories that fit all plants, with specific children for structures that differ among taxa.
Examples:
-sporangium>microsporangium>pollen sac
-apical cell>shoot apical cell>leaf apical cell>vascular or non-vascular leaf apical cell
-archesporial cell>male archesporial cell or female archesporial cell