Difference between revisions of "Plant Ontology Webinar- May 2011 release"
(→Topics) |
|||
Line 27: | Line 27: | ||
==Topics== | ==Topics== | ||
− | ==What are the most important changes that had to be made to accommodate mosses and other non-angiosperm plants?== | + | ==1. Philosophy behind the organization of the ontology== |
+ | |||
+ | How terms are grouped | ||
+ | |||
+ | ==2. What are the most important changes that had to be made to accommodate mosses and other non-angiosperm plants?== | ||
===Top level reorganization=== | ===Top level reorganization=== | ||
Line 33: | Line 37: | ||
'''Adding new categories to encompass all structures:''' | '''Adding new categories to encompass all structures:''' | ||
− | * | + | *collective plant structure |
*cardinal organ part | *cardinal organ part | ||
Line 43: | Line 47: | ||
*rhizoid | *rhizoid | ||
− | Theses changes were important for | + | *trichome |
+ | |||
+ | *plant anatomical space | ||
+ | |||
+ | Theses changes were important for all plants | ||
+ | |||
+ | '''Redefining upper-level terms of the plant structure branch''' | ||
− | + | New definitions of plant cell, plant organ, portion of plant tissue, plus the new terms listed above, make these definitions appropriate for all plants | |
-Adding new mid-level terms | -Adding new mid-level terms | ||
-Inserting new low-level terms | -Inserting new low-level terms |
Revision as of 21:21, 12 May 2011
This page is under construction....
Goals:
To demonstrate the new plant anatomy terms that have been added to accommodate mosses and give reviewers a brief tutorial on how to use PO.
People to invite- potential Reviewers:
Stefan Rensing and Daniel Lang of the Physcomitrella group, University of Freiburg, Germany;
Brent Mishler, UC Berkeley, USA, (bmishler@berkeley.edu) Brent Mishler
Bill Buck (NYBG) William Buck (bbuck@nybg.org)
Michael L. Christianson- now at Department of Plant and Microbial Biology, University of California, Berkeley, California (mxianson@pacbell.net)
B. Crandall-Stotler (Southern Illinois University)
B. Goffinet (University of Connecticut)
Scott Schuette (Southern Illinois University) link
(will present talk on Physco bioinformatics at our symposium at the IBC)
Topics
1. Philosophy behind the organization of the ontology
How terms are grouped
2. What are the most important changes that had to be made to accommodate mosses and other non-angiosperm plants?
Top level reorganization
Adding new categories to encompass all structures:
- collective plant structure
- cardinal organ part
- collective organ part structure
- embryonic plant structure
- rhizoid
- trichome
- plant anatomical space
Theses changes were important for all plants
Redefining upper-level terms of the plant structure branch
New definitions of plant cell, plant organ, portion of plant tissue, plus the new terms listed above, make these definitions appropriate for all plants
-Adding new mid-level terms
-Inserting new low-level terms