Saturday Sept 10th, 2011 - Revision history

Cooperl: /* Issues with current PGDSO: */

2011-09-16T18:42:59Z

Issues with current PGDSO:

2011-09-16T18:31:12Z

OBO Foundry application

2011-09-16T18:30:51Z

OBO Foundry application

2011-09-16T18:28:56Z

PO publications

2011-09-16T18:24:14Z

Task 7: Determine which relations are needed to link the PAO and PDSO

2011-09-16T17:57:18Z

Task 1. Clarify the domain of the PGDSO and define the root-level term accordingly

2011-09-16T17:57:06Z

Task 1. Clarify the domain of the PGDSO and define the root-level term accordingly

2011-09-16T17:56:18Z

Specific tasks for achieving the goals outlined above

2011-09-16T17:47:39Z

Task 6. Add new mid-level terms need to describe growth or development stages for non-angiosperm plants

2011-09-16T17:47:08Z

1. Clarify the domain of the PGDSO and define the root-level term accordingly

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:42, 16 September 2011
Line 20:		Line 20:

	''We will keep the numbers in the names, but try putting them in parentheses. Can't use square brackets because obo interprets those differently.''		''We will keep the numbers in the names, but try putting them in parentheses. Can't use square brackets because obo interprets those differently.''
		+
		+	''After the meeting, we tested it and it worked fine [http://dev.plantontology.org:8080/amigo/go.cgi?view=details&search_constraint=terms&depth=0&query=PO:0007057&session_id=6522b1311285460 germination]''

	''We will change any names that suggest that they are not stages, and get rid of plural names.''		''We will change any names that suggest that they are not stages, and get rid of plural names.''

@@ Line 195: / Line 195: @@
 =OBO Foundry application=
-''BS said that the OBO foundry is working on a form to send to applicants. We can fill that in once it is available.  We also need a PO web/wiki page that shows the annotations by source database and links to those pages where the PO is featured.''
+''BS said that the OBO foundry is working on a form to send to applicants. We can fill that in once it is available.''
 =PO publications=

@@ Line 195: / Line 195: @@
 =OBO Foundry application=
-''BS said that the OBO foundry is working on a form to send to applicats. We can fill that in once it is available.''
+''BS said that the OBO foundry is working on a form to send to applicants. We can fill that in once it is available.  We also need a PO web/wiki page that shows the annotations by source database and links to those pages where the PO is featured.''
 =PO publications=

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:28, 16 September 2011
Line 202:		Line 202:

	-tasks remaining to be done: ''Get annotations for maize, Physcomitrella, grape, and strawberry. Use these annotations to do a comparison of gene expression between vascular and non-vascular leaves and among vascular leaves (or some other structure) in different vascular plants (corn, rice, strawberry, grape, and potato).''		-tasks remaining to be done: ''Get annotations for maize, Physcomitrella, grape, and strawberry. Use these annotations to do a comparison of gene expression between vascular and non-vascular leaves and among vascular leaves (or some other structure) in different vascular plants (corn, rice, strawberry, grape, and potato).''
		+
		+	''Comment from BS: In order to improve the chances of getting this accepted by Plant Physiology, it would be good to reduce the focus in the beginning section on the "update" and offer it as a new work.''

	-target journal: ''Plant Physiology''		-target journal: ''Plant Physiology''

@@ Line 188: / Line 188: @@
 *others
-Is there a way we can implement color coding the Anatomy and Development terms differently so that when they display under the other aspect it is clearer where they came from?
+''Is there a way we can implement color coding the Anatomy and Development terms differently so that when they display under the other aspect it is clearer where they came from?
-This was a suggestion raised by PJ during the discussion of the cross-ontology relations.
+This was a suggestion raised by PJ during the discussion of the cross-ontology relations.''
 This has been added to the [[POC_Technical_Issues_Page]] for consideration

@@ Line 82: / Line 82: @@
 *if possible, refer to BFO or other upper-level ontology
-''We decided that the PGDSO should encompass only development stages. We will use landmarks to define stages, but not include landmarks in the PO.
+''We decided that the PGDSO should encompass only development stages. We will use landmarks to define stages, but not include landmarks in the PO.''
-Any developmental processes that we use as landmarks that are not already in GO can be requested.''
+''Any developmental processes that we use as landmarks that are not already in GO can be requested.''
 ''from the [https://docs.google.com/document/d/1pXA5zYp8PwhN0RuouDG67RY_Q4Eu5iLrA2yXArzxNiY/edit?hl=en_US&pli=1 Google doc]:''

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:56, 16 September 2011
Line 77:		Line 77:

	==Specific tasks for achieving the goals outlined above==		==Specific tasks for achieving the goals outlined above==
−	~~for more details see below:~~
−
	''Notes in this section cover our work on the goals or tasks from the both morning and afternoon.''		''Notes in this section cover our work on the goals or tasks from the both morning and afternoon.''

@@ Line 175: / Line 175: @@
 ''Did not work much on this.  We can do more on this as we move forward''
-==Task 6. Add new mid-level terms need to describe growth or development stages for non-angiosperm plants==
+===Task 6. Add new mid-level terms need to describe growth or development stages for non-angiosperm plants===
 ''We looked at the list of growth and development stages requested by the Moss Ontology, and started to work on the placement and definitions for some of them.''

@@ Line 81: / Line 81: @@
 ''Notes in this section cover our work on the goals or tasks from the both morning and afternoon.''
-===1. Clarify the domain of the PGDSO and define the root-level term accordingly===
+===Task 1. Clarify the domain of the PGDSO and define the root-level term accordingly===
 *if possible, refer to BFO or other upper-level ontology