POC Conf. Call 9-29-10 - Revision history

Cooperl: /* Updating and Fixing the Annotations */

2010-10-06T22:19:58Z

Updating and Fixing the Annotations

Rwalls: /* Other Items */

2010-10-01T14:16:20Z

Other Items

Cooperl: /* Other Items */

2010-09-30T20:26:55Z

Other Items

Cooperl: /* Other Items */

2010-09-30T20:26:36Z

Other Items

Cooperl: /* Updates to the PO Web pages */

2010-09-30T20:03:00Z

Updates to the PO Web pages

Cooperl: /* Updates to the PO Web pages */

2010-09-30T18:40:17Z

Updates to the PO Web pages

Cooperl: /* Updates to the PO Web pages */

2010-09-30T18:38:48Z

Updates to the PO Web pages

Cooperl: /* Status and Update of Progress: PO Release */

2010-09-30T18:13:53Z

Status and Update of Progress: PO Release

Rwalls: /* Obsoleting terms in the Ontology */

2010-09-30T17:47:27Z

Obsoleting terms in the Ontology

Cooperl: /* Comments from other reviewers */

2010-09-30T16:27:56Z

Comments from other reviewers

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:19, 6 October 2010
Line 177:		Line 177:
	They would prefer us to set up an script to automatically retrieve the files from their FTP site (there was apparently some agreement to do this in the past). They are updated weekly- do we want to reload the files between releases to keep the annotations more up-to-date?		They would prefer us to set up an script to automatically retrieve the files from their FTP site (there was apparently some agreement to do this in the past). They are updated weekly- do we want to reload the files between releases to keep the annotations more up-to-date?

−	''PJ: TAIR should be responsible for submitting their ~~there~~ own files to us. LC will correspond with Tanya Bernadini about it. ''	+	''PJ: TAIR should be responsible for submitting their own files to us. LC will correspond with Tanya Bernadini about it. ''

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:16, 1 October 2010
Line 372:		Line 372:

	'''*Update from Alejandra about images for the PO'''		'''*Update from Alejandra about images for the PO'''
		+
		+	Ramona will go to Ithaca on Oct. 20th to work with Alejandra on loading images onto Plantsystematics.org and linking them with the PO.

	==PO slims==		==PO slims==

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:26, 30 September 2010
Line 371:		Line 371:


−	*Update from Alejandra about images for the PO	+	'''*Update from Alejandra about images for the PO'''

	==PO slims==		==PO slims==

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:26, 30 September 2010
Line 369:		Line 369:

	''Tabled for next meeting''		''Tabled for next meeting''
		+
		+
		+	*Update from Alejandra about images for the PO

	==PO slims==		==PO slims==

@@ Line 225: / Line 225: @@
 ''Tabled: Will deal with after the release is done''
-* Need a page to list publications that cite the PO- ''all agreed''  ''-RW created a page on the wiki a few months ago (http://wiki.plantontology.org:8080/index.php/Plant_Ontology_Citations), but it has not been populated yet. We already have a Related Publications page -- need to go through this and see if some of those links belong on the Citations page.''
+* Need a page to list publications that cite the PO- ''all agreed''  ''
-The PO Home Page was updated in August 2010 to reflect the new consortium members (OSU, NYBG, Cornell).  Do people want links there to their personal sites?
+-RW created a page on the wiki a few months ago [http://wiki.plantontology.org:8080/index.php/Plant_Ontology_Citations PO Citations], but it has not been populated yet. We already have a Related Publications page -- need to go through this and see if some of those links belong on the Citations page.''
 ''Send it to Laurel if you have one you want to use.''

@@ Line 228: / Line 228: @@
 The PO Home Page was updated in August 2010 to reflect the new consortium members (OSU, NYBG, Cornell).  Do people want links there to their personal sites?
-''We need an "About Us" page similar to Gramene's''  Also the link on the PO page "Contact the Plant Ontology Consortium" opens an email to po-dev (which has 78 people on it).  Shouldn't this go to po-internal? .
+''Send it to Laurel if you have one you want to use.''
 Should we have a link to the outreach page from the home page??  ''Yes''

@@ Line 15: / Line 15: @@
 '''Steps to get the release out - by the end of the week'''
--The revised ontology files from the dev browser have been combined with the updated annotation files on the Beta browser for review.  ''Please look it over for any problems- esp with annotations.  Still having the issue with the browsing feature and graphical view not working.  Post item on AmiGO SF tracker?''
+-The revised ontology files from the dev browser have been combined with the updated annotation files on the Beta browser for review.
 -Updating the annotation files: TAIRs are done (see comments below),
 Naama Menda submitted files from SGN for the anatomy ontology (not on beta browser),
-''PJ: The SGN files should be separate files for the different species.  Laurel will contact her and get it corrected''
+''PJ: The SGN files should be separate files for the different species.  Laurel has contacted her and they get it corrected''
 Gramene- Updates have been made to the files on the SVN.
@@ Line 99: / Line 101: @@
 ''Laurel posted a note on the OE bug tracker regarding these two errors.''
 What happens to the annotations?
 *One advantage of merging is that the comments from the obsoleted term are merged into the comments of the replacement term. But a big disadvantage is that the term is destroyed.
@@ Line 148: / Line 151: @@
 However, Seth was not sure how much of this is in the current version of AmiGO.  Chris- Perhaps you know better??
-''This may be an option in the new version that JE is working to implement.  BS: should allow user to choose by filters if the obsoletes are going to be displayed.  Default should be to not display them.  Request on SF AmiGO feature request tracker.''
+''This may be an option in the new version that JE is working to implement.''
-''PJ: OBOEdit should have a field that would show date of term creation and date made obsolete, a history with the reason for making it obsolete (this should probably go into the obsolete term's comment field).  Request on SF OE feature request tracker.''
+''PJ: OBOEdit should have a field that would show date of term creation and date made obsolete, a history with the reason for making it obsolete (this should probably go into the obsolete term's comment field).  RW: will request on SF OE feature request tracker.''
 ==Updating and Fixing the Annotations ==

@@ Line 76: / Line 76: @@
 Chris Hardy?
-These will have to go into the next set of revisions, if we get anything from them at this point.
+''These will have to go into the next set of revisions, if we get anything from them at this point.''
 ===Obsoleting terms in the Ontology===