POC Conf. Call 9-22-10 - Revision history

Rwalls: /* Other Items */

2010-09-23T15:44:48Z

Other Items

2010-09-23T15:41:44Z

Other Items

2010-09-23T10:54:27Z

floral bud PO:0000056

2010-09-23T10:39:29Z

Upcoming meetings 2010-2011:

2010-09-23T10:37:59Z

Other Items

2010-09-23T10:35:23Z

seedling PO:0008037

2010-09-22T21:33:23Z

floral bud PO:0000056

2010-09-22T21:31:09Z

gametophyte PO:0009004

2010-09-22T21:30:28Z

Priorities for the Next Round of Revisions

2010-09-22T21:07:22Z

Annotation Errors

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:44, 23 September 2010
Line 276:		Line 276:


−	We felt that the Amigo browser should be able to display obsolete terms that match search criterea, possibly as a search option. Laurel will post request on Amigo feature request at Source Forge.	+	We felt that the Amigo browser should be able to display obsolete terms that match search criterea, possibly as a search option. Laurel will post request on Amigo feature request tracker at Source Forge.

	==PO slims==		==PO slims==

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:41, 23 September 2010
Line 273:		Line 273:

	''Ramona and Dennis will respond to him. PJ: Should show him examples of papers that that study gametophyte or sporophyte in Physco and how that would be annotated.''		''Ramona and Dennis will respond to him. PJ: Should show him examples of papers that that study gametophyte or sporophyte in Physco and how that would be annotated.''
		+
		+
		+
		+	We felt that the Amigo browser should be able to display obsolete terms that match search criterea, possibly as a search option. Laurel will post request on Amigo feature request at Source Forge.

	==PO slims==		==PO slims==

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:54, 23 September 2010
Line 223:		Line 223:


−	''In general, all were in favor of the proposed schema, but PJ felt that the develops_from relationship should be left off for now, until we have time to look in depth at the terms.''	+	''In general, all were in favor of the proposed schema, but PJ felt that the develops_from relationship should be left off for now, until we have time to look in depth at the terms. We will need to consider if there should be terms like terminal flower and axillary flower, etc. to parallel the structure of bud. If so, then the develops_from relations should be at that level. DWS: We will also need to consider compound versus simple strobilus.''

	=== Annotation Errors ===		=== Annotation Errors ===

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:39, 23 September 2010
Line 308:		Line 308:
	Registration is open, abstract deadline Nov 1, 2010.		Registration is open, abstract deadline Nov 1, 2010.

−	''Lol and Ramona should plan on attending and meeting with collaborators. Set up a computer demonstration, and possibly a Phenote workshop. Perhaps Dennis and Alejandra could also attend, and we could all meet there. PJ is not attending as he is teaching.''	+	From last week: ''Lol and Ramona should plan on attending and meeting with collaborators. Set up a computer demonstration, and possibly a Phenote workshop. Perhaps Dennis and Alejandra could also attend, and we could all meet there. PJ is not attending as he is teaching.''

@@ Line 272: / Line 272: @@
 re: setting up an ontology for bryophytes with a focus on the model moss Physcomitrella patens.
-Ramona and Dennis will respond to him.
+''Ramona and Dennis will respond to him. PJ: Should show him examples of papers that that study gametophyte or sporophyte in Physco and how that would be annotated.''
 ==PO slims==

@@ Line 154: / Line 154: @@
 ''This should be replacd_by, rather than consider. Need to investigate whether it is better to use replaced_by or to merge terms.''
-''Seedling should be a narrow synonym of whole plant.''
+''Seedling should be a narrow synonym of whole plant. We will need to work on the former part_of chidren of seedling (embryo axis and cotyledon) for the next round of revisions.''
 === sporophyte PO:0009003===

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:33, 22 September 2010
Line 223:		Line 223:
	[[File:Inflor_buds_9-20-2010.jpg]]		[[File:Inflor_buds_9-20-2010.jpg]]

		+
		+	''In general, all were in favor of the proposed schema, but PJ felt that the develops_from relationship should be left off for now, until we have time to look in depth at the terms.''

	=== Annotation Errors ===		=== Annotation Errors ===

@@ Line 197: / Line 197: @@
 -added consider 'female gametophyte' (PO:0020092)'
-'''''Laurel is working on getting the updated files from Gramene, since the ones on the SVN are about 11 months old. See above. '''''
+''Laurel is working on getting the updated files from Gramene, since the ones on the SVN are about 11 months old. See above.''
 ===[http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&aid=3016634&group_id=76834&atid=835555 floral bud PO:0000056]===

@@ Line 266: / Line 266: @@
 -What is the target date for the next release?
-http://plantco.de
+re: setting up an ontology for bryophytes with a focus on the model moss Physcomitrella patens.
 ==PO slims==

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:07, 22 September 2010
Line 227:		Line 227:

	In the course of investigating where annotations for obsolete terms should be moved to, Laurel and Ramona came across several annotations that appear to be incorrect.		In the course of investigating where annotations for obsolete terms should be moved to, Laurel and Ramona came across several annotations that appear to be incorrect.
		+
	''Laurel corrected any she ran across in the process of updating the files.''		''Laurel corrected any she ran across in the process of updating the files.''