POC Conf. Call 6-21-11 - Revision history

Rwalls: Replaced content with ''''POC meeting, Webex Conference Call; Date: Tuesday June 21st, 2011 10am (PDT)''' In attendance: POC members: Absent: Collaborators: Acceptance of the minutes from…'

2011-06-17T23:39:18Z

Replaced content with ''''POC meeting, Webex Conference Call; Date: Tuesday June 21st, 2011 10am (PDT)''' In attendance: POC members: Absent: Collaborators: Acceptance of the minutes from…'

Show changes

Rwalls: /* Action items */

2011-06-15T14:31:56Z

Action items

Rwalls: /* Proposed solutions: */

2011-06-15T14:31:37Z

Proposed solutions:

Rwalls: /* Concern from TAIR over how annotations move through relations */

2011-06-15T14:31:16Z

Concern from TAIR over how annotations move through relations

Rwalls: /* New xref in database */

2011-06-15T14:31:06Z

New xref in database

Rwalls: /* Concern from TAIR over how annotations move through relations */

2011-06-15T14:27:01Z

Concern from TAIR over how annotations move through relations

Rwalls: /* New xref in database */

2011-06-15T14:26:03Z

New xref in database

Rwalls: /* New xref in database */

2011-06-15T14:08:30Z

New xref in database

Rwalls: /* New xref in database */

2011-06-15T14:08:14Z

New xref in database

Rwalls: /* Concern from TAIR over how annotations move through relations */

2011-06-15T14:07:42Z

Concern from TAIR over how annotations move through relations

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:31, 15 June 2011
Line 129:		Line 129:

	===Action items===		===Action items===
		+	???

	==Annotations on terms that are part_of leaf==		==Annotations on terms that are part_of leaf==

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:31, 15 June 2011
Line 127:		Line 127:

	See [[PO_Annotation_Extensions_(column_16)]] for a full explanation of how this would work.		See [[PO_Annotation_Extensions_(column_16)]] for a full explanation of how this would work.
		+
		+	===Action items===

	==Annotations on terms that are part_of leaf==		==Annotations on terms that are part_of leaf==

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:31, 15 June 2011
Line 62:		Line 62:
	I was wondering '''if you would consider producing a file of the PO that does not contain the 'trickier to count' new relationships?'''		I was wondering '''if you would consider producing a file of the PO that does not contain the 'trickier to count' new relationships?'''

		+	===Action items===

	'''Do we want to create a file without has_part, develops_from, derives_from, and adjacent_to?'''		'''Do we want to create a file without has_part, develops_from, derives_from, and adjacent_to?'''

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:31, 15 June 2011
Line 47:		Line 47:

	RW also updated the file at http://plantontology.org/docs/dbxref/PO_DBXref.txt.		RW also updated the file at http://plantontology.org/docs/dbxref/PO_DBXref.txt.
		+
		+	===Action items===

	'''Do we need to do anything else to get the new xrefs to link automatically?'''		'''Do we need to do anything else to get the new xrefs to link automatically?'''

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:27, 15 June 2011
Line 59:		Line 59:

	I was wondering '''if you would consider producing a file of the PO that does not contain the 'trickier to count' new relationships?'''		I was wondering '''if you would consider producing a file of the PO that does not contain the 'trickier to count' new relationships?'''
		+
		+
		+	'''Do we want to create a file without has_part, develops_from, derives_from, and adjacent_to?'''

	=Items arising from previous meetings:=		=Items arising from previous meetings:=

@@ Line 48: / Line 48: @@
 RW also updated the file at http://plantontology.org/docs/dbxref/PO_DBXref.txt.
-Do we need to do anything else to get the new xrefs to link automatically?
+'''Do we need to do anything else to get the new xrefs to link automatically?'''
 ==Concern from TAIR over how annotations move through relations==

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:08, 15 June 2011
Line 46:		Line 46:


−	RW also updated the file at [http://plantontology.org/docs/dbxref/PO_DBXref.txt].	+	RW also updated the file at http://plantontology.org/docs/dbxref/PO_DBXref.txt.

	Do we need to do anything else to get the new xrefs to link automatically?		Do we need to do anything else to get the new xrefs to link automatically?

@@ Line 32: / Line 32: @@
 abbreviation: OBO_SF_PO
 database: Source Forge OBO Plant Ontology (PO) term request tracker
 object: Term request
 example_id: OBO_SF_PO:3184921
 generic_url: http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=browse&group_id=76834&atid=835555
 url_syntax: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=[example_id]&group_id=76834&atid=835555
 url_example: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=3184921&group_id=76834&atid=835555
-RW also updated the file at http://plantontology.org/docs/dbxref/PO_DBXref.txt
+RW also updated the file at [http://plantontology.org/docs/dbxref/PO_DBXref.txt].
 Do we need to do anything else to get the new xrefs to link automatically?

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:07, 15 June 2011
Line 25:		Line 25:

	For more Workshop details: [http://www.iplantcollaborative.org/Communities/Developers/SemanticWeb Semantic web].		For more Workshop details: [http://www.iplantcollaborative.org/Communities/Developers/SemanticWeb Semantic web].
		+
		+	=Tech issues=
		+	==New xref in database==
		+
		+	A stanza for our SF tracker has been added to GO.xrf_abbs (thanks to Becky Foulger):
		+
		+	abbreviation: OBO_SF_PO
		+	database: Source Forge OBO Plant Ontology (PO) term request tracker
		+	object: Term request
		+	example_id: OBO_SF_PO:3184921
		+	generic_url: http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=browse&group_id=76834&atid=835555
		+	url_syntax: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=[example_id]&group_id=76834&atid=835555
		+	url_example: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=3184921&group_id=76834&atid=835555
		+
		+
		+	RW also updated the file at http://plantontology.org/docs/dbxref/PO_DBXref.txt
		+
		+	Do we need to do anything else to get the new xrefs to link automatically?

	==Concern from TAIR over how annotations move through relations==		==Concern from TAIR over how annotations move through relations==