POC Conf. Call 6-1-10 - Revision history

Cooperl: /* Upcoming Conferences and Meetings: Updates: */

2010-06-01T20:31:12Z

Upcoming Conferences and Meetings: Updates:

Cooperl: /* Agenda: */

2010-06-01T20:15:39Z

Agenda:

Cooperl at 20:14, 1 June 2010

2010-06-01T20:14:46Z

Cooperl at 20:14, 1 June 2010

2010-06-01T20:14:33Z

Rwalls: /* Agenda: */

2010-06-01T19:18:31Z

Agenda:

Rwalls: /* Agenda: */

2010-06-01T19:17:57Z

Agenda:

Rwalls at 19:07, 1 June 2010

2010-06-01T19:07:45Z

Rwalls: /* Agenda: */

2010-06-01T19:06:15Z

Agenda:

Rwalls at 18:25, 1 June 2010

2010-06-01T18:25:10Z

Cooperl at 18:05, 1 June 2010

2010-06-01T18:05:04Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:31, 1 June 2010
Line 243:		Line 243:


−	'''8. Next meeting scheduled for '''Tuesday June ~~7th~~ at 10am PDT'''.'''	+	'''8. Next meeting scheduled for '''Tuesday June 8th at 10am PDT'''.'''

@@ Line 21: / Line 21: @@
 '''1. POC workshop to be held in Corvallis on June 29th/30th.'''
-I have set up a page on the POWiki [[http://wiki.plantontology.org:8080/index.php/POC_Meeting_and_Workshop_June_29th_and_30th,_Corvallis,_OR#Questions:  Corvallis Worshop June 29th and 30th, 2010]]
+I have set up a page on the POWiki [[http://wiki.plantontology.org:8080/index.php/POC_Meeting_and_Workshop_June_29th_and_30th,_Corvallis,_OR#Questions:  Corvallis Workshop June 29th and 30th, 2010]]
 We need to think about what the goals of the meeting will be and who will be invited, etc.

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:14, 1 June 2010
Line 12:		Line 12:

	Acceptance of the minutes from the last meeting? All in favor?		Acceptance of the minutes from the last meeting? All in favor?
−	''Both of us (Laurel and Ramona) accepted the minutes as posted.''	+
		+	''Both of us (Laurel and Ramona)accepted the minutes as posted.''

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:14, 1 June 2010
Line 12:		Line 12:

	Acceptance of the minutes from the last meeting? All in favor?		Acceptance of the minutes from the last meeting? All in favor?
		+	''Both of us (Laurel and Ramona) accepted the minutes as posted.''

@@ Line 198: / Line 198: @@
 on the ontology structure.
-''Discussed what would be a good example. The tuber terms above could be good to discuss, but we really need an example that spans the divide from bryophytes to angiosperms.''
+''Discussed what would be a good example. The tuber terms above could be good useful, but we really need an example that spans the divide from bryophytes to angiosperms.''
 ==Upcoming Conferences and Meetings: Updates:==

@@ Line 82: / Line 82: @@
-''We decided that the word 'tissue' on the end of each term was unnecessary, but the group still has to decide if we should use portion of.''
+''We decided that the word 'tissue' on the end of each term was unnecessary, but the group still has to decide if we should use 'portion of.'''
-''Decided to make classify part of the tuber flesh (like medulla and perimedulla) under there respective part (pith or cortex) and make them a part_of subterranean tuber storage parenchyma.''
+''Decided to classify parts of the tuber flesh (like medulla and perimedulla) under there respective part (pith or cortex) and make them a part_of subterranean tuber storage parenchyma.''
 ''Discussed tuber eye and tuber epidermis, but decided to wait until more of the group was present before making any decisions on them.''

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:06, 1 June 2010
Line 80:		Line 80:

	*What is the rule/policy on having the same synonym for multiple terms? If someone is searching for flesh, they may mean either tuber flesh, fruit flesh, or flesh in some other tissue, so it might make sense to have flesh be a synonym of portion of storage parenchyma tissue, portion of fruit storage parenchyma tissue, portion of tuber storage parenchyma tissue, portion of aerial tuber storage parenchyma tissue, and portion of subterranean tuber storage parenchyma tissue.		*What is the rule/policy on having the same synonym for multiple terms? If someone is searching for flesh, they may mean either tuber flesh, fruit flesh, or flesh in some other tissue, so it might make sense to have flesh be a synonym of portion of storage parenchyma tissue, portion of fruit storage parenchyma tissue, portion of tuber storage parenchyma tissue, portion of aerial tuber storage parenchyma tissue, and portion of subterranean tuber storage parenchyma tissue.
		+
		+
		+	''We decided that the word 'tissue' on the end of each term was unnecessary, but the group still has to decide if we should use portion of.''
		+
		+	''Decided to make classify part of the tuber flesh (like medulla and perimedulla) under there respective part (pith or cortex) and make them a part_of subterranean tuber storage parenchyma.''
		+
		+	''Discussed tuber eye and tuber epidermis, but decided to wait until more of the group was present before making any decisions on them.''


Line 180:		Line 187:
	Minutes of the [[POC-Traitnet meeting 05-28-2010, NYBG]] are on the PO wiki.		Minutes of the [[POC-Traitnet meeting 05-28-2010, NYBG]] are on the PO wiki.

		+
		+	''Any who wants to learn more about this meeting can look at the minutes or contact Ramona directly.''

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 POC meeting, Webex Conference Call; Date: June 1st, 2010 10am (PDT)
-In attendance: POC members:
+''Minutes in italics below agenda items''
-Absent:
+In attendance: POC members:  Laurel Cooper (OSU), Ramona Walls (NYBG),
 Acceptance of the minutes from the last meeting? All in favor?

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:05, 1 June 2010
Line 178:		Line 178:


−	'''4. Complete one branch of ontology for demonstration purposes'''	+	'''4. Complete one branch of ontology for demonstration purposes?'''

	This would provide material for presentations at meetings this summer.		This would provide material for presentations at meetings this summer.