POC Conf. Call 2-26-13 - Revision history

Cooperl: /* PRO-PO-GO meeting, May 15-16th 2013 */

2013-04-04T19:00:47Z

PRO-PO-GO meeting, May 15-16th 2013

Cooperl: /* PRO-PO-GO meeting, May 15-16th 2013 */

2013-04-04T18:56:30Z

PRO-PO-GO meeting, May 15-16th 2013

Cooperl: /* PRO-PO-GO meeting, May 15-16th 2013 */

2013-04-04T18:55:49Z

PRO-PO-GO meeting, May 15-16th 2013

Cooperl: /* PRO-PO-GO meeting, May 15-16th 2013 */

2013-04-04T18:53:20Z

PRO-PO-GO meeting, May 15-16th 2013

Cooperl: /* PRO-PO-GO meeting, May 15-16th 2013 */

2013-04-04T18:49:01Z

PRO-PO-GO meeting, May 15-16th 2013

Cooperl: /* PRO-PO-GO meeting, May 15-16th 2013 */

2013-04-04T18:47:52Z

PRO-PO-GO meeting, May 15-16th 2013

Cooperl: /* PRO-PO-GO meeting, May 15-16th 2013 */

2013-04-04T18:45:33Z

PRO-PO-GO meeting, May 15-16th 2013

Cooperl: /* Shoot system development stage and child terms */

2013-04-01T23:23:00Z

Shoot system development stage and child terms

Cooperl: /* Shoot system development stage and child terms */

2013-04-01T23:22:02Z

Shoot system development stage and child terms

Cooperl: /* Shoot system development stage and child terms */

2013-04-01T23:11:26Z

Shoot system development stage and child terms

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:00, 4 April 2013
Line 167:		Line 167:

	PRO Consortium members: Cathy Wu, Alan Ruttenberg (Buffalo)		PRO Consortium members: Cathy Wu, Alan Ruttenberg (Buffalo)
−
−	''Need to share the PO with representatives from the ontologies and resources such as PRO, PIR (Claire O'Donovan), Uniprot. Annotations to newly sequenced plant genomes are going into Plant Ensemble, Uniprot etc. Want to build early relationship with them to develop quality measures for plant-based ontology annotations. Section on annotations is needed.''
−
−	~~''JB wanted to explore genotype and phenotype connections, can only stay for part of the day on Thursday''~~
−
−	~~''Need to know who will speak about what. Looking for volunteers.''~~
−
−	~~''Separate the sessions on disease and phenotype, include TO discussion to there?''~~
−
−	~~''RW presentation on Plant-IDO?, interest in new Plant DO, existing DO is no good (?)''~~

	==1st International Workshop on Semantics for Biodiversity (S4BIODIV), Montpellier, 26-30 May 2013==		==1st International Workshop on Semantics for Biodiversity (S4BIODIV), Montpellier, 26-30 May 2013==

@@ Line 176: / Line 176: @@
 ''Separate the sessions on disease and phenotype, include TO discussion to there?''
-''RW presentation on Plant-IDO, interest in new Plant DO, existing DO is no good (?)''
+''RW presentation on Plant-IDO?, interest in new Plant DO, existing DO is no good (?)''
 ==1st International Workshop on Semantics for Biodiversity (S4BIODIV), Montpellier, 26-30 May 2013==

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:55, 4 April 2013
Line 175:		Line 175:

	''Separate the sessions on disease and phenotype, include TO discussion to there?''		''Separate the sessions on disease and phenotype, include TO discussion to there?''
		+
		+	''RW presentation on Plant-IDO, interest in new Plant DO, existing DO is no good (?)''

	==1st International Workshop on Semantics for Biodiversity (S4BIODIV), Montpellier, 26-30 May 2013==		==1st International Workshop on Semantics for Biodiversity (S4BIODIV), Montpellier, 26-30 May 2013==

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:53, 4 April 2013
Line 173:		Line 173:

	''Need to know who will speak about what. Looking for volunteers.''		''Need to know who will speak about what. Looking for volunteers.''
		+
		+	''Separate the sessions on disease and phenotype, include TO discussion to there?''

	==1st International Workshop on Semantics for Biodiversity (S4BIODIV), Montpellier, 26-30 May 2013==		==1st International Workshop on Semantics for Biodiversity (S4BIODIV), Montpellier, 26-30 May 2013==

@@ Line 170: / Line 170: @@
 ''Need to share the PO with representatives from the ontologies and resources such as PRO, PIR (Claire O'Donovan), Uniprot. Annotations to newly sequenced plant genomes are going into Plant Ensemble, Uniprot etc.  Want to build early relationship with them to develop quality measures for plant-based ontology annotations.  Section on annotations is needed.''
-''JB wanted to explore genotype and phenotype connections''
+''JB wanted to explore genotype and phenotype connections, can only stay for part of the day on Thursday''
 ''Need to know who will speak about what. Looking for volunteers.''

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:47, 4 April 2013
Line 169:		Line 169:

	''Need to share the PO with representatives from the ontologies and resources such as PRO, PIR (Claire O'Donovan), Uniprot. Annotations to newly sequenced plant genomes are going into Plant Ensemble, Uniprot etc. Want to build early relationship with them to develop quality measures for plant-based ontology annotations. Section on annotations is needed.''		''Need to share the PO with representatives from the ontologies and resources such as PRO, PIR (Claire O'Donovan), Uniprot. Annotations to newly sequenced plant genomes are going into Plant Ensemble, Uniprot etc. Want to build early relationship with them to develop quality measures for plant-based ontology annotations. Section on annotations is needed.''
		+
		+	''JB wanted to explore genotype and phenotype connections''

	''Need to know who will speak about what. Looking for volunteers.''		''Need to know who will speak about what. Looking for volunteers.''

@@ Line 168: / Line 168: @@
 PRO Consortium members: Cathy Wu, Alan Ruttenberg (Buffalo)
-''BS would like a list of who we would like to include in the meeting and whose costs can be covered by PO''
+''Need to share the PO with representatives from the ontologies and resources such as PRO, PIR (Claire O'Donovan), Uniprot. Annotations to newly sequenced plant genomes are going into Plant Ensemble, Uniprot etc.  Want to build early relationship with them to develop quality measures for plant-based ontology annotations.  Section on annotations is needed.''
 ==1st International Workshop on Semantics for Biodiversity (S4BIODIV), Montpellier, 26-30 May 2013==

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:23, 1 April 2013
Line 38:		Line 38:


−	Propose revising the comment by adding this at the beginning: ''A COPS is a collection of two or more cardinal organ parts (PO:0025001) that are part of adjacent plant organs (PO:0009008). But this ''	+	Propose revising the comment by adding this at the beginning: ''A COPS is a collection of two or more cardinal organ parts (PO:0025001) that are part of adjacent plant organs (PO:0009008). But this is basically just restating the def'n, not sure it helps much.''
−
−

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:22, 1 April 2013
Line 38:		Line 38:


−	Propose revising the comment by adding this at the beginning: ''A COPS is a collection of two or more cardinal organ parts (PO:0025001) that are part of adjacent plant organs (PO:0009008).''	+	Propose revising the comment by adding this at the beginning: ''A COPS is a collection of two or more cardinal organ parts (PO:0025001) that are part of adjacent plant organs (PO:0009008). But this ''


Line 52:		Line 52:


−	Propose revised def'n: plant organ development stage (PO:0025339): A multi-tissue plant structure development stage (new PO:id) that begins when the shoot apical meristem initiates plant organ primordia.	+	Propose revised def'n: plant organ development stage (PO:0025339): A multi-tissue plant structure development stage (new PO:id) that begins when the shoot apical meristem initiates plant organ primordia.

@@ Line 29: / Line 29: @@
 ''BS: It would be good to add a comment to clarify the meaning of the two collective plant structure terms.  e.g. "A CPOS is a collection of plant organs (a multi-organ structure).  Could also add this as a synonym.''
-''LC: I suggested we could add clarity by dropping the word "structure" from the names and it would not change the meanings. Also we would avoid adding a new, undefined word to the ontology.  I am not sure that multi-organ structure adds clarity tot eh meaning. ''
+''LC: I suggested we could add clarity by dropping the word "structure" from the names and it would not change the meanings. Also we would avoid adding a new, undefined word to the ontology.  I am not sure that 'multi-organ structure' adds clarity to the meaning. ''
 ''* collective plant organ structure (PO:0025007): A collective plant structure (PO:0025497) that is a proper part of a whole plant (PO:0000003), and is composed of two or more adjacent plant organs (PO:0009008) and the associated portions of plant tissue (PO:0009007).''