POC Conf. Call 10-16-12 - Revision history

Cooperl: /* Update from Cornell */

2012-11-12T21:56:12Z

Update from Cornell

2012-11-09T01:13:15Z

2012-11-09T01:01:15Z

2012-10-19T19:37:06Z

PO "Aspect" vs. "Ontology Branch"

2012-10-19T19:31:45Z

PO "Aspect" vs. "Ontology Branch"

2012-10-19T19:31:32Z

PO "Aspect" vs. "Branch"

2012-10-19T19:09:45Z

PO "Aspect" vs. "Branch"

2012-10-19T19:04:32Z

PO "Aspect" vs. "Branch"

2012-10-19T19:02:09Z

PO "Aspect" vs. "Branch"

2012-10-19T19:01:24Z

PO Aspect vs. Branch

@@ Line 22: / Line 22: @@
 I need to finish a couple of manuscripts for my other two grants due at the end of this month, but after that I have already separate a block of time for editing slides.
--Update odf schedule:
+-Update of schedule:
 * In the field from December 1 to the 22, no email access
 * In New Zealand from January 9th to 24th (no or very limited access after Jan 15th)

@@ Line 6: / Line 6: @@
 Absent: Dennis Stevenson (NYBG), Chris Mungall (Lawrence Berkeley National Lab)
 Collaborators: none
@@ Line 13: / Line 12: @@
 Download recording link: https://ontology.webex.com/ontology/lsr.php?AT=dw&SP=MC&rID=69148902&rKey=43711462fbe1ed02
 Any changes or corrections (additions/deletions, etc) needed in the minutes from the [[POC_Conf._Call_10-9-12]]?  ''No additions, deletions, or changes.''

@@ Line 16: / Line 16: @@
-Any changes or corrections (additions/deletions, etc) needed in the minutes from the [[POC_Conf._Call_10-9-12]]? ''Not additions, deletions, or changes.''
+Any changes or corrections (additions/deletions, etc) needed in the minutes from the [[POC_Conf._Call_10-9-12]]?  ''No additions, deletions, or changes.''
 Back to [[POC Meetings Minutes]]
@@ Line 238: / Line 238: @@
 PRO Consortium members: Cathy Wu, Alan Ruttenberg (Buffalo)
-=Next meeting scheduled for Tuesday, Oct 30th, 2012 at 10am PDT/1pm EDT=
+=Next meeting scheduled for [[POC_Conf._Call_11-6-12]] at 10am PDT/1pm EDT=
 No meeting next week.

@@ Line 57: / Line 57: @@
 Can be updated on live and beta sites once it is approved.
-''The use of "Aspect" is widely adopted throughout our system.  In June 2012, RW went through a number of the webpages and changed the references to "ontology" to "Aspect".  In addition, column 9 on the association file is "Aspect. Not sure is this is an issue. Go still uses 'Ontology' on their browser"
+''The use of "Aspect" is widely adopted throughout our system.  In June 2012, RW went through a number of the webpages and changed the references to "ontology" to "Aspect", so those papges will have to be updated as well.  In addition, column 9 on the association file is "Aspect. Not sure is this is an issue. Go still uses 'Ontology' on their browser"
 =New fruit development stages for individual fruits=

@@ Line 57: / Line 57: @@
 Can be updated on live and beta sites once it is approved.
-''The use of "Aspect" is widely adopted throughout our system.  In June 2012, Ramona went through a number of the webpages and chnged the references to "ontology" to "Aspect".  In addition, column 9 on the association file is "Aspect. Not sure is this is an issue. Go still uses 'Ontology' on their browser"
+''The use of "Aspect" is widely adopted throughout our system.  In June 2012, RW went through a number of the webpages and changed the references to "ontology" to "Aspect".  In addition, column 9 on the association file is "Aspect. Not sure is this is an issue. Go still uses 'Ontology' on their browser"
 =New fruit development stages for individual fruits=

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:09, 19 October 2012
Line 56:		Line 56:

	Can be updated on live and beta sites once it is approved.		Can be updated on live and beta sites once it is approved.
		+
		+	''The use of "Aspect" is widely adopted throughout our system. In June 2012, Ramona went through a number of the webpages and chnged the references to "ontology" to "Aspect"

	=New fruit development stages for individual fruits=		=New fruit development stages for individual fruits=

@@ Line 49: / Line 49: @@
 =PO "Aspect" vs. "Branch"=
-''BS was concerned about the heading "Aspect" on the PO page, because it has a very specific meaning in library science. We should change it to say "Ontology branch". May need to wait for a release, because it is part of the database.''
+''BS was concerned about the heading "Aspect" on the PO term pages, because it has a very specific meaning in library science. We should change it to say "Ontology branch". May need to wait for a release, because it is part of the database.''
 ''GO still uses "ontology". They should perhaps switch that as well.''
-''Updated  to "Ontology Branch" on [http://dev.plantontology.org/amigo/go.cgi?view=details&search_constraint=terms&depth=0&query=PO:0009011&session_id=2645b1350430824 po-dev]''
+''Updated  to "Ontology Branch" on [http://dev.plantontology.org/amigo/go.cgi?view=details&search_constraint=terms&depth=0&query=PO:0009011&session_id=2645b1350430824 po-dev]'' on the term pages and "Filter tree view" in browser.
-Can be updated on live and beta sites once it is approved
+Can be updated on live and beta sites once it is approved.
 =New fruit development stages for individual fruits=

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:02, 19 October 2012
Line 54:		Line 54:

	''Updated to "Ontology Branch" on [http://dev.plantontology.org/amigo/go.cgi?view=details&search_constraint=terms&depth=0&query=PO:0009011&session_id=2645b1350430824 po-dev]''		''Updated to "Ontology Branch" on [http://dev.plantontology.org/amigo/go.cgi?view=details&search_constraint=terms&depth=0&query=PO:0009011&session_id=2645b1350430824 po-dev]''
		+
		+	Can be updated on live and beta sites once it is approved

	=New fruit development stages for individual fruits=		=New fruit development stages for individual fruits=

@@ Line 48: / Line 48: @@
 JP will coordinate the appropriate PO emails and web site announcements with Lol. Thanks!
-=PO Aspect vs. Branch=
+=PO "Aspect" vs. "Branch"=
 ''BS was concerned about the heading "Aspect" on the PO page, because it has a very specific meaning in library science. We should change it to say "Ontology branch". May need to wait for a release, because it is part of the database.''