Minutes 3-16-10 - Revision history

Cooperl at 22:33, 17 March 2010

2010-03-17T22:33:50Z

2010-03-17T21:09:48Z

2010-03-17T20:59:12Z

2010-03-17T20:58:34Z

2010-03-17T20:56:06Z

2010-03-17T18:51:06Z

2010-03-17T18:47:40Z

2010-03-17T18:05:26Z

2010-03-17T15:53:55Z

2010-03-17T15:22:17Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:33, 17 March 2010
Line 173:		Line 173:
	This item was tabled for discussion at the next meeting.		This item was tabled for discussion at the next meeting.

−	''Action item: Ramona will post her comments to this term about making whole plant the parent to gametophyte and sporophyte, rather than a sibling to them, so people could comment there. ''	+	''Action item: Ramona will post her comments to this term about making whole plant the parent to gametophyte and sporophyte, rather than a sibling to them, so people could comment there. ''

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:09, 17 March 2010
Line 237:		Line 237:
	* Complete discussion of new children of cardinal organ part and collective plant structure.		* Complete discussion of new children of cardinal organ part and collective plant structure.

−	* Definitions of simple and compound organ. Posted on SourceForge..	+	* Definitions of spore, simple organ and compound organ. Posted on SourceForge..

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:59, 17 March 2010
Line 1:		Line 1:
	'''Agenda and Minutes- POC Webex Conference Call, Tues Mar 16th, 11am PDT'''		'''Agenda and Minutes- POC Webex Conference Call, Tues Mar 16th, 11am PDT'''

−	In attendance: Laurel Cooper (minutes), Ramona Walls ~~(minutes)~~, Alejandra Gandolfo, Chris Mungall, Dennis Stevenson. Absent: Pankaj Jaiswal, Barry Smith.	+	In attendance: Laurel Cooper (minutes), Ramona Walls, Marie Alejandra Gandolfo, Chris Mungall, Dennis Stevenson. Absent: Pankaj Jaiswal, Barry Smith.

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:58, 17 March 2010
Line 165:		Line 165:


−	''Note: we will need to add the term spore to the PO. Action item: Laurel will ~~create these~~ on SF.''	+	''Note: we will need to add the term spore to the PO. Action item: Laurel will post it on SF.''

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:56, 17 March 2010
Line 165:		Line 165:


−	''Note: we will need to add the term spore to the PO. ~~Ramona or~~ Laurel will ~~post a term request~~ on SF.''	+	''Note: we will need to add the term spore to the PO. Action item: Laurel will create these on SF.''

@@ Line 233: / Line 233: @@
 '''Items for upcoming meetings:'''
-* Complete discussion of gametphyte, sporophyte and whole plant.
+* Complete discussion of gametophyte, sporophyte and whole plant.
 * Complete discussion of new children of cardinal organ part and collective plant structure.
-* Definitions of simple and compound organ. Ramona will post on Source Forge before we discuss them.
+* Definitions of simple and compound organ. Posted on SourceForge..

@@ Line 219: / Line 219: @@
 ''PJ commented (before the meeting) that do not want to rush it and that we will need to thoroughly test the new structure with annotations from our collaborators.''
-'''8. Next conference call- Tuesday March 23rd- 11am.'''  Remember it is Pacific Daylight Time.
+- I am working with a representative of Data2  for purchasing the bar-coding labels, these will be used for the "slide type collection" for database and to easily retrieve images. ''
-Items for upcoming meetings:
+'''8. Next conference call- Tuesday March 23rd- 11am?.'''  Remember that is Pacific Daylight Time.
-    * Definitions of simple and compound organ. Ramona will post on Source Forge before we discuss them.
+'''Items for upcoming meetings:'''
-    * Older items on Source Forge, such as layer of cells or layer of tissue, multiple suggested new is_a parents, outgrowth or projection, etc. Ramona will summarize before we discuss them.
+* Complete discussion of new children of cardinal organ part and collective plant structure.
-−
+* Definitions of simple and compound organ. Ramona will post on Source Forge before we discuss them.

@@ Line 136: / Line 136: @@
      * Do we need to open a SF tracker item for each and every one or can these be dealt with as a group under the corresponding parent term?
-''The group agreed that it was best not to make separate SF Tracker items for each of these when dealing with groups of terms.  PJ suggested the best way to deal with this is to create a new "children of" term for each of these and list the terms that are affected.''
+''The group agreed that it was best not to make separate SF Tracker items for each of these when dealing with groups of terms.  PJ suggested the best way to deal with this is to create a new "children of" term for each of these and list the terms that are affected.  He further commented that any terms where there was a change in the part_of (or is_a) relationship should have a new tracker item, with a link to the "new  is_a children of COP/ CPS" terms''
 ''Action item: Ramona will create these on SF''

@@ Line 191: / Line 191: @@
 ''All agreed that this was the best practice''
-'''6. Source Forge issues'''
+'''6. SourceForge issues'''
 Should there be a separate SF tracker for growth and developmental stages?
 ''CM suggested that this was perhaps not necessary, as all the same people are looking at them both.  We could consider creating two 'groups' (1. Anatomy and 2. Growth and Development) then people could use the sort and display filters.
-''
+Ramona created two groups: 1. Plant Structure and 2. Growth and Development Stages.  New terms should be assigned to the appropriate group.''
 Do we need to get an email from SF every time someone makes a change?

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:22, 17 March 2010
Line 13:		Line 13:

	Ramona and Laurel moved a group of terms so they are now children of these two structures. These include all the terms that don't have is_a parents and are appropriate, plus a few others (see below:)		Ramona and Laurel moved a group of terms so they are now children of these two structures. These include all the terms that don't have is_a parents and are appropriate, plus a few others (see below:)
		+	Note: The existing part_of relationships were retained except as noted below.

	'''a. new children of cardinal organ part (currently without is_a parent):'''		'''a. new children of cardinal organ part (currently without is_a parent):'''