Live Plant Image Group - Revision history

Jaiswal at 16:20, 30 April 2012

2012-04-30T16:20:25Z

Cooperl: /* Stable URIs for OWL RDF version of PO terms */

2011-05-10T22:46:15Z

Stable URIs for OWL RDF version of PO terms

Cooperl at 22:44, 10 May 2011

2011-05-10T22:44:11Z

Cooperl at 22:43, 10 May 2011

2011-05-10T22:43:07Z

Cooperl at 22:42, 10 May 2011

2011-05-10T22:42:47Z

Cooperl: Created page with 'See the link to the [POC_Conf._Call_5-10-11&action=edit§ion=16]'

2011-05-10T22:42:14Z

Created page with 'See the link to the [POC_Conf._Call_5-10-11&action=edit&section=16]'

New page

See the link to the [POC_Conf._Call_5-10-11&action=edit&section=16]

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:20, 30 April 2012
Line 16:		Line 16:

	"The files available from here correspond to the live version of the PO (ie, not the development version which undergoes frequent changes). However, we are working on updating the system we use to generate these files because much of the information was lost in the obo-owl conversion (such as definitions). I'm not sure if the information you are looking for is currently missing, but just letting you know that we are aware that some info is missing from those files."		"The files available from here correspond to the live version of the PO (ie, not the development version which undergoes frequent changes). However, we are working on updating the system we use to generate these files because much of the information was lost in the obo-owl conversion (such as definitions). I'm not sure if the information you are looking for is currently missing, but just letting you know that we are aware that some info is missing from those files."
		+
		+
		+
		+	[[Category:Collaborations]]

@@ Line 3: / Line 3: @@
 ==Stable URIs for OWL RDF version of PO terms==
-Question from Steve Baskauf of the [https://sites.google.com/site/liveplantimagegroup/ Live Plant Image Group] (via email earlier this week)
+Question from Steve Baskauf of the [https://sites.google.com/site/liveplantimagegroup/ Live Plant Image Group] (via email)
 "We are working on creating and defining standardized views for live plant images.  We have compiled a [https://sites.google.com/site/liveplantimagegroup/photographic-standards-and-standard-views-background/standardized-views-grid consensus list of views] and have moved into the stage of creating technical definitions for them.  We are considering using Plant Ontology terms to indicate the plant part that is the subject of the image.

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:44, 10 May 2011
Line 1:		Line 1:
	See the link to the [[POC_Conf._Call_5-10-11#Stable_URIs_for_OWL_RDF_version_of_PO_terms]]		See the link to the [[POC_Conf._Call_5-10-11#Stable_URIs_for_OWL_RDF_version_of_PO_terms]]
		+
		+	==Stable URIs for OWL RDF version of PO terms==
		+
		+	Question from Steve Baskauf of the [https://sites.google.com/site/liveplantimagegroup/ Live Plant Image Group] (via email earlier this week)
		+
		+	"We are working on creating and defining standardized views for live plant images. We have compiled a [https://sites.google.com/site/liveplantimagegroup/photographic-standards-and-standard-views-background/standardized-views-grid consensus list of views] and have moved into the stage of creating technical definitions for them. We are considering using Plant Ontology terms to indicate the plant part that is the subject of the image.
		+
		+	However, we will probably create the technical definitions in RDF and therefore are interested in URIs to serve as objects of the descriptive properties used in the term definitions. Although the form of the PO identifiers suggests a URI (i.e. a namespace prefix of "PO:"), after surfing through the PO website for some time, I have not been able to find any actual namespace definition for "PO:" in the form of an HTTP URI. Is there one?
		+
		+	Also, the representation of the ontology is apparently OBO format. We are interested in an OWL representation of PO. I realize that there are tools which can do an OBO to OWL conversion, but it would be more straightforward (from our point of view) to be able to refer to a URI which resolves to OWL RDF.
		+
		+	Does that exist? In particular, we would like the end LPIG product to be usable by the LOD/Semantic Web, hence our interest in dereferencable HTTP URIs."
		+
		+	JE responded to them and send them the existing link: [http://owlfiles.plantontology.org PO Owl files] with a note of explanation:
		+
		+	"The files available from here correspond to the live version of the PO (ie, not the development version which undergoes frequent changes). However, we are working on updating the system we use to generate these files because much of the information was lost in the obo-owl conversion (such as definitions). I'm not sure if the information you are looking for is currently missing, but just letting you know that we are aware that some info is missing from those files."

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:43, 10 May 2011
Line 1:		Line 1:
−	See the link to the [POC_Conf._Call_5-10-11#Stable_URIs_for_OWL_RDF_version_of_PO_terms]	+	See the link to the [[POC_Conf._Call_5-10-11#Stable_URIs_for_OWL_RDF_version_of_PO_terms]]

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:42, 10 May 2011
Line 1:		Line 1:
−	See the link to the [POC_Conf._Call_5-10-11~~&action=edit&section=16~~]	+	See the link to the [POC_Conf._Call_5-10-11#Stable_URIs_for_OWL_RDF_version_of_PO_terms]