Descendants of leaf - Revision history

Rwalls: /* current part_of children of leaf */

2011-01-31T14:11:22Z

current part_of children of leaf

2011-01-31T13:35:23Z

current is_a children of vascular leaf

2011-01-28T22:18:17Z

current part_of children of vascular leaf

2011-01-28T22:08:49Z

current is_a children of leaf

2011-01-28T22:00:21Z

current part_of children of vascular leaf

2011-01-28T21:53:01Z

current is_a children of vascular leaf

2011-01-28T21:52:33Z

current is_a children of vascular leaf

2011-01-28T21:45:01Z

Descendants of leaf

2011-01-28T21:44:48Z

2011-01-28T21:41:09Z

current part_of children of leaf

@@ Line 21: / Line 21: @@
 *leaf epidermis - ok as is
-*leaf endodermis -- I think there is never an endodermis in non-vascular leaves, so this should be part_of vascular leaf
+*leaf endodermis -- I think there is never an endodermis in non-vascular leaves, and this should be part_of vascular leaf, but Physco group requested the term leaf endodermis.
 ==current is_a children of vascular leaf==

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:35, 31 January 2011
Line 32:		Line 32:

	*adult leaf		*adult leaf
		+
		+	Physco group has included these terms in their ontology, so they want to use them. In that case, either need to make them children of leaf instead of vascular leaf, or add separate terms for vascular and non-vascular juvenile, transition and adult leaves.

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:18, 28 January 2011
Line 76:		Line 76:
	*leaf sheath - probably ok - does it ever occur in non-vascular leaves?		*leaf sheath - probably ok - does it ever occur in non-vascular leaves?

		+
		+	(see [https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&aid=3167333&group_id=76834&atid=835555 part_of children of leaf])

	Terms I'm not sure about:		Terms I'm not sure about:

@@ Line 9: / Line 9: @@
 *vascular leaf - ok as is
-*prophyll (PO:0009042; is_a phyllome) and scale leaf (PO:0006003; is_a phyllome) should be children of vascular leaf
+*prophyll (PO:0009042; is_a phyllome) and scale leaf (PO:0006003; is_a phyllome) should be children of vascular leaf (see [https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&aid=3167323&group_id=76834&atid=835555 prophyll and scale leaf])
 *Need to add frond and needle as exact synonyms of vascular leaf

@@ Line 54: / Line 54: @@
 ==current part_of children of vascular leaf==
-auricle - ok
+*auricle - ok
-bundle sheath - ok
+*bundle sheath - ok
-leaf abscission zone - ok
+*leaf abscission zone - ok
-leaf aerenchyma- is there ever aerenchyma in non-vascular leaves?
+*leaf collar - ok
-leaf collar - ok
+*leaf vascular system - ok
-leaf intercalary meristem - probably ok - does it ever occur in non-vascular leaves?
+*ligule - ok
-leaf lamina - should be part_of leaf
+*petiole - ok
-leaf margin - should be part_of leaf
+*stipule - ok
-leaf mesophyll - should probably be part of leaf. Is there a mesophyll in non-vascular leaves?
+*leaf intercalary meristem - probably ok - does it ever occur in non-vascular leaves?
-leaf sheath - probably ok - does it ever occur in non-vascular leaves?
+*leaf sheath - probably ok - does it ever occur in non-vascular leaves?
-ligule - ok
+Terms I'm not sure about:
-petiole - ok
+*leaf aerenchyma- is there ever aerenchyma in non-vascular leaves?
-stipule - ok
+*leaf mesophyll - should probably be part of leaf. Is there a mesophyll in non-vascular leaves?

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:53, 28 January 2011
Line 41:		Line 41:


−		+	Terms that are probably okay:

	*rosette leaf - probably ok - Are there ever rosette's in bryophytes?		*rosette leaf - probably ok - Are there ever rosette's in bryophytes?

@@ Line 25: / Line 25: @@
 ==current is_a children of vascular leaf==
-juvenile leaf
+Is there heteroblasty in non-vascular leaves? do these terms apply?
-transition leaf
+*juvenile leaf
-adult leaf
+*transition leaf
--is there heteroblasty in non-vascular leaves? do these terms apply?
+*adult leaf
-simple leaf
+Do we want to keep these (as phenotype terms)? At one point we discussed getting rid of them?
-compound leaf
+*simple leaf
--do we want to keep these (as phenotype terms)? At one point we discussed getting rid of them
+*compound leaf
-cotyledon - ok
+*rosette leaf - probably ok - Are there ever rosette's in bryophytes?
-leaf spine - ok
+*cauline leaf - probably ok
-cigar leaf - ok
+*cotyledon - ok
 ==current part_of children of vascular leaf==

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:45, 28 January 2011
Line 1:		Line 1:
−	=~~Descendants~~ of leaf=	+	=Suggested changes to descendants of leaf=

	Some of the current part_of children of vascular leaf should probably be part_of leaf, plus a few other changes		Some of the current part_of children of vascular leaf should probably be part_of leaf, plus a few other changes

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:44, 28 January 2011
Line 1:		Line 1:
−	~~01/27/2011~~	+	=Descendants of leaf=
		+
		+	Some of the current part_of children of vascular leaf should probably be part_of leaf, plus a few other changes

	==current is_a children of leaf==		==current is_a children of leaf==

@@ Line 13: / Line 13: @@
 ==current part_of children of leaf==
-leaf apex
+*leaf apex - ok as is
-leaf base
+*leaf base - ok as is
 ==current is_a children of vascular leaf==